Nukitsamehe natuke kaasajastatud variant

Postitatud paar minutit varem siin

Long story short: Õde-venda Iti ja Kusti läksid metsa marjule ja eksisid ära, aga sattusid kurja nõia hurtsikusse, kus kõigil olid sarved peas. 5G antennid, noh.

Nõid ja vanamees olid pereväärtuste suured toetajad, nii et nad olid valmis treinud lausa kolm last: kaks vanemat poega Mõhk ja Tölpa: "Üks laisk, teine loll!!!11" (mõlemad perverdid) ja kolmas oli Nukitsamees, aga tal olid nooruse tõttu veel 2.5G sarved. Õieti sarvekesed.

Omavalitsus, kus mets, polnud see, kust Iti ja Kusti pärit olid. Niisiis selle natuke korrumpeerunud omavalitsuse abil ja mahitusel "adopteeris" nõid Iti ja Kusti, et saada veel rohkem lasteraha.

No ja kui omavalitsuse lastekaitsetädikesed enam ei vaadanud, pani nõid Iti ja Kusti orjatööle ja tegi neile palju haiget.

Iti ja Kusti põgeneda ei saanud, sest ümberringi on hirmus, kõrge mets, mis kubiseb huntidest.

Nukitsamees kiusas ka Itit (tõmbas vist juustest), kuid Kusti kaitses Itit, mille eest Kusti sai Nõialt kõvasti sugeda. Iti suutis kõigest hoolimata väikse Nuktisamehe vastu õrn olla ja Nukitsamehel tekkis kasuvenna ja -õe vastu kiindumus.

Aga järsku avastas keegi suure kullapaja ja kogu pereväärtuste eest seisev pesakond läks ahnelt kullapada välja kaevama. Sarvik vanamees samuti.

Nukitsamees jäeti omapead.

Iti ja Kusti kasutasid võimalust ja põgenesid ära. Nukitsamees põgenes neile järele, mispeale kraaksus vares pereväärtuste eest nii väga seisvale ja suure himuga rahapaja ümber askeldavale nõiaperekonnale, et näe, lapsed on ula peal.

Hakkas suur tagaajamine, kuid Iti, Kusti ja Nukitsamees jõudsid veel õigel ajal metsast välja. Selgus, et nõiaperele päikesevalgus eriti ei meeldinud.

Iti, Kusti ja Nukitsamees jõudsid õnnelikult koju, aga Nukitsamees tundus kõigile väga räpakas. Selge see, et väikelaps ja orb, kuigi sarvedega, oli oma vanas peres väärkoheldud (räpakas, noh).

Laps pesti puhtaks, pandi puhtad riided selga-jalga ja anti korralikult süüa.

Nõialt ja Nõid-vanamehelt võeti vanemlikud õigused ära ja Iti ja Kusti pere ajas adopteerimispaberid korda ja laps jäeti perre.

Aga Nukitsamehe 2.5G sarvekesi kuidagi eemaldada ei saadud. Prooviti igat moodi, viilides ja saagides nukitsad 2G, siis 1G ja siis 0G suuruseks, aga sarved kasvasid kähku tagasi.

Lõppu ma hästi ei mäleta, aga Nukitsamees sai sarvedest mingi ime läbi lahti (ta sai juhuslikult haiget ja nuttis esimest korda siiralt).

No ja nii elasid kõik õnnelikult elupäevade lõpuni.

Epiloog:

Mis nõiast sai, ei ole täpselt teada, aga nähtavasti viidi kogu laste väärkohtlemise asi politseisse, mille tagajärjel mõisteti Nõid laste orjastamises ja väärkohtlemises süüdi ja kohus andis jälle liiga leebe karistuse. Nõial oli palju tegemist vangiminekuga ja ta puksis vastu. Aga lõpuks läks.

Nõid-vanamees viidi nõukogude atmosfääri ning kurjade ja õelate hooldajatega haisvasse hooldushaiglasse (mõistagi surema).

Mõhk ja Tölpa said kaasosalistena kahepeale paar kuud + tingimisi. Tsoonist väljudes viidi nad sotsiaalkorterisse ja ühiskondlikult kasulikule tööle. Sest Tallinn aitab. Kasu nendest midagi ei olnud, nii et kõik saadeti sunniviisiliselt hullumajja.

Kuna nõiapere hoidmine oli kulukas, kuulutati nõrgamõistuslikkuse diagnoos valeks ja nad saadeti kõik nõiamajja tagasi.

Aga ahned bürokraatiast mitte väga kaugel olevad kelmitädikesed kuskilt naabermetsast nihverdasid vahepeal nõiapere ID-kaardid endale. Järsku toimus nõiamajas tulekahju. Kuna vingu- ja suitsuandurit majas polnud, põlesid kõik maha, aga mets imekombel pääses. (maja oli lagendikul, tulekahju talvel)

Tulekahjust ja surmadest teatasid kelmidest tädikesed alles peale seda kui olid jõudnud nihverdada surnud nõiapere ID-kaartidega korrumpeerunud notari juures ära nõiapere kõigi liikmete testamendid endale; tädikesed olevat olnud "nõiapere kauaaegsed sõbrannad" ja lausa "ainsad pärijad". Loomulikult lasid nad nõiapere surnukehad kremeerida.

Nii sahkerdasid nõiapere ID-kaartidega kelmitädikesed nõiapere varanduse endale ja müüsid metsa metsafirmale maha, et see saaks harvesteridega lageraiet teha.

Mis rahapajast sai, ei ole teada, sest keegi sellest Muinsuskaitseametile ei hinganud.

Today in History (04.07.2013)

* News that Douglas Engelbart, inventor of the computer mouse, has died at 88 (passed away on 02.07.2013);
* NASA decommissions weather satellite Jason-I (11), because the satellite's last transmitter finally failed;
* King Albert II of Belgium (79) announced that he will abdicate on July 21.

In other news:

Europe
* France apologizes: Je Suis Sorry;
* And now it's been reported that France's own French Fries are not much different from Freedom Fries somewhere far, far away;
* while in

United States
* ...most everyone else rather ungratiously confirms what has been going on all along at the Ministries of Peace, Love, and Truth.
* A huge wildfire in Arizona still remains out of control.

Middle East
* Egypt's military stage a coup yesterday, installing a judge to be acting president today. The U.S. threatens withdrawal of aid to Egypt, while Israel tries to be nice.

Science and tech
* Vine and Instagram fight like a cat and dog: competition in video sharing functionality heats up. Ten years ago we would not have known what these things even are;
* Livers can be grown in laboratory from stem cells. We really are living the future.

Rich Juzwiak's glasses. A critique.

So the video is here, the start is set to 1:27.

The following is a list of which glasses I liked the most on Rich Juzwiak, the writer at Gawker.

All in all I counted 19 different pairs.

Disclaimer: I'm gay, too, so all this is meant from my rather reserved (and maybe conservative) perspective of (gay) fashion.

So, if anyone gets to read this, I hope ye won't feel offended, 'cuz I meant to have fun with this :>

And, so, here goes...

1. Light ones. The colours match, but proportions seem wrong;
2. Best light frames;
3. (Black with thickish frames) Best in a dark-lit club or intellectual event;
4. (red ones) Too fabulous;
5. (golden ones) - kinda fabulous, but not in a good way;
6. < This one is the favourite, for some reason, but they're pink, too. Only that the pink colour there is not so in your face. So, if the frame colour were slightly different...
7. Blue - too fabulous, too 1970's;
8. Black ones with white edges - Too Apple. "I want to hide myself."
9. (light frames) Too fabulous and outdated;
10. Black shades. This must have something to do with retrofuturism, but I somehow like it. "I hide myself, but I still want to see you."
11. Police Cruiser shades. The most form-fitting, except that it accentuates the nose the most (sorry, Rich, I like you the most when you're not wearing spectacles (;
12. Dark ones. It's warm and light outside. Yuppie style;
13. Square shades. I like those. 1980's (retro)futurism. Still accentuates the nose.
14. Black shades. Fabulous, 1979 going on 1982. I don't know, which way, though.
15. Red, again. Too fabulous.
    
16. Dark shades. I don't know.


17. Dorky, Gotham style. Maybe if you meet The Dark Knight one day...


18. 1970's, def. Southern states;


19. Big black ones. The Fly. Jeff Goldblum.

Tuvix

This was essentially an IMDb forum post reply, but I decided to put that up here first, becuse I thought my ideas are just so compelling :gt; to let them go away, as forum posts sometimes do on IMDb...

Janeway had to choose between not keeping Tuvix alive and not having Tuvok and Neelix around. Essentially her obligation was to her crewmembers Tuvok and Neelix, who she felt she had to save. — Especially Tuvok, who was the only one who Janeway could talk to, because no-one else would listen unless absolutely necessary :>

Chances are that if the writers and producers were willing to have Tuvix alongside Tuvok and Neelix, then it would have been quite a bit more intersting a tv show than what dreck Voyager ended up being. I am not sure how it would have fared budget-wise, but perhaps Tuvix could have been made a regular...

My mind went into overdrive around here:

Neelix would be completely sidelined in his cooking duties much to his chagrin (loss of any culinary status and interaction with crew in the kitchen), and then to add insult to injury, Tuvix could have knocked up Kes in very quick order :9 (I wouldn't have minded that after "Warlord", which was Jennifer Lien's best episode). All that would have given Neelix two very good reasons to be extremely jealous, jealous, jealous!!1 :>

But if Tuvix were kept, then I would have done away with Harry Kim (I'd say he should have been assimilated into Species 8472) and Chakotay (assimilated by the Borg). In the process, "Voyager" could have for some time been a battlefield, and its crew desperately caught between Borg and Species 8472 fighting one another, with the poor ship disparately flying to and fro Borg space and occasionally the Fluidic space.

There should have been some reason for Voyager to be the bone of contention between the two big powers. Maybe the super-important Omega molecule (or even a collection of them) freeflying 'round the ship of its (their) own volition, with neither power being able to get it, because of its rather elusive nature...

For all that time, that would have been very taxing to Janeway, who'd end up having PTSD, making multiple mistakes and judgements of error after Chakotay's assimilation — cuz she was secretly pining for him... And the Borg Queen terrorizing Janeway by privately showing the capt'n not just the first time the Borg actually reproduce themselves (by then, Chakotay would be the sperm donor 1+n times). Because of all that, Janeway would probably end up a poor crazy woman by the end of the show. (Kate Mulgrew's chance at Emmys.)

In the end, Tuvok would have become Commander and Tuvix would have gotten some or all of Tuvok's duties (suppose Tuvok was out of commission for a short while, so Tuvix would have gotten valuable battlefield experience). Once the doctor decided Janeway was no good anymore, Tuvok would be acting captain or something. Torres would be second-in-command, Seven of Nine would do engineering.

Chances are also, that Tuvok's impending mental disease issue would have withered away, given that Tuvix was half-Vulcan and 'family' enough to help with the healing. I wonder how that would have looked like... Anyways, if that wouldn't help right away (since Tuvix is only half-Vulcan and might genetically harbour the same disease, which would perhaps emerge much later than in Tuvok), Torres would get command and Tuvok would give her progressively insane advice (which against all odds ends up working).

Tom Paris would still be the flyboy, maybe even literally after accidentally getting into a transporter accident with some flying bug. (Emmys for makeup or even sfx!)

And attrition would have allowed for some new faces (and perhaps also better actors) to emerge to the fore on the ship to replace lost senior crew. Romulans, anyone?

Reflections on the Politico/NBC News Republican Presidential Candidates Debate at Reagan Library

What began as a quick write-up based on comments written during the debate, became a more lengthy post, due to my near-perfectionist efforts at design.

So, in the quickest order, I found the best stream of the chatter at Ronald Reagan Presidential Library was embedded at The Right Scoop website, courtesy of the-always-resourceful-MSNBC.

The candidates start and often continue with spewing rhetorical crap, mostly dodging difficult subjects and questions. Bachmann and Cain outshine everyone else in this.

The Republican candidates always mention the number of children they have and the number of adopted children they have. Lots of children for "old times' insurance", I suppose...
Jon Huntsman only has two and these are adopted, also, and legally brought over to the U.S. Why didn't he adopt American children??

• Michele Bachmann frets about "Obamacare", mentions Obama rather often, maybe just as Obama mentioned Bush-Cheney throughout his campaign. After that, other candidates are very much agreeable enough to fret about "Hillarycare". Otherwise lots of hot air. Bachmann criticizes Obama on Libya, thinks it was wrong to go there (Obama really didn't, but I don't understand where her allegiances lie). I infer her support for oil drilling in Everglades (talks about energy and responsibility). Confuses green job creation in Spain and its high unemployment, which was caused by a construction and property bust.

• Mitt Romney manages to mention renewable resources, too, where he proposes a mixed package, which I say, is a wise move. Mentions even oil shale (!).

Thinks that Obama has to go (which everyone else heartily agrees with), yet offers no solutions himself, except creating nebulous "jobs" — maybe in the fashion that Bachmann talked about getting gas prices to $2/gal.

Romney believes in the Tea Party movement. Foundlessly criticizes Obama. Talks about the middle class, only that the Republican middle class are the rich.

• Ron Paul is old, criticizes Reagan's policy (though loves his 'message'), and criticizes really everything, so remaining an eternal opposition figure. Wants to abolish TSA (maybe because of probably having been subject to a 'pat-down', given his frequent trips on airplanes, but we don't know that :).

• The Texas governor Rick Perry says stupid things, thinks Social Security is a Ponzi scheme. Calls Texas education cuts 'thoughtful reductions', then claims that there's no dearth of educated people in Texas, because of Facebook and Toyota having opened base there — but that's because Texas has about the lowest taxes in all of the U.S.

Perry, though, likes a balanced budget by wanting an amendment passed to support it. Then somehow offers platitudes to Obama (I hear an attempt to woo conservative democrats). Wants clear entrance and exit strategies when invading another country, criticizes Obama on this, yet that was a burden bourne out of Obama's predecessors.

Gaffe: "Ozone levels down Xx%!"

As governor, has signed the most executions in a state to date (which means more than GWB), doesn't lose sleep if even one person executed is innocent, because he believes that there is a working (and 'just') system in place.

• Herman Cain (the only African-American Republican candidate, who's speech also has a nice twang :) wants to fix everything — this infers all things being broken, even in crisis, which everyone agrees with. Does not answer about GE getting huge profits, but legally not having to pay taxes in the U.S. The answer is iffy.

• Jon Huntsman (Idaho) is too slick in both speech and appearance and has a deep tan. Did he spend a vacation in Mexico? Thinks "we've lost our confidence as a country," wants to make his eyes misty — Is that for real? Has two adopted children. What about biological children? Wants to bring troops home (audience claps hands) and has good ideas about how to go on in Afghanistan. Does not cut down on hot fluff, though. Supports science (vis-a-vis creationism, climate change caused by human activity, I didn't hear anything about stem cells).

Everyone agrees with Homeland Security Dpt.

• Newt Gingrich is seasoned, agrees with Obama's programme of charter schools. Proposes humane treatment of illegal immigrants, not deporting them.

• Rick Santorum is a Roman Catholic candidate. Has the most balanced rhetoric, but is very uninformed and stutters — the latter not necessarily being a bad trait, given the popularity of "The King's Speech", all of which also reminds me about Lt. Reginald Barclay in "Star Trek: The Next Generation". Was positive about immigration.

Misc and Other gripes

Sarah Palin's noted absence has taken away some of the entertainment value from the debate.

For a long while Telemundo journo's face is not shown at the beginning.

To follow the debates further, see here.

Conclusion

Of most Republican candidates, each have at least one good idea — These are Romney, Paul, Perry, Huntsman, Gingrich, and Santorum (well, so-so). Perry even has two, Huntsman three, Gingrich is tied between the two. Santorum has said the least, so in many ways he's trying to cover his base.

My wish-list of Republican policies based on the debate
(In a somewhat increasing order of importance)

• Support science vis-a-vis creationism and climate change caused by human activity (Huntsman);
• Implement charter schools — this should circumvent stubborn teacher's unions (Gingrich);
• Abolish TSA (Paul) — then what?
• Diversify energy production and supply (Romney) — this would put a simmer on oil and gas prices;
• Balance the budget (Perry) — How? Only with cuts and no tax increases?
• Bring troops home, realign Afghanistan strategy and tactics to adapt to asymmetrical warfare (Huntsman);
• Have clear entry and exit strategies when invading a country, and then only under a U.N. mandate (Perry);

  See in-depth commentary in the sidebar —

  Necessary exceptions could be had with a budget surplus, as happened with the Bosnian War and Kosovo, which actions met stiff opposition from Russia and China.

  OTOH, the actions taken re Libya (before UN-mandated action) and Syria in the condition of a lack of money for any further U.S.-based adventures are cheap — just wait until the local people have protests, an uprising, and then a revolution. Maybe a civil war, if the dictator is a nasty d***head.

  Afghanistan notwithstanding, such a flow of events could have taken place in Iraq, and with a substantially lesser loss of lives, blood and treasure on either side, popular support guaranteed (see current events, like the Arab Spring). This could even have inspired more people in Iran.

  Furthermore, lots of friendly oil-rich countries post-Arab Spring should be happy to export to the West (potentially a mutual feeling), which should bring petrol prices well down from current levels. Suppose the U.S. were always like it now is during the Arab Spring, then countries of that region would have been even friendlier, but The Street over there is very suspicious because of heavy infractions past and current. Now it's not the U.S., but Facebook, Twitter and Google.

  Not so in North Korea, but we can wait ... :>

  A very unfortunate thing is that dictatorial states are fairly often supported and propped up by large authoritarian countries that are not particularly friendly towards the West. This is usually caused by a lack of Western friends because of various human rights infringements and other failures of state. Well, if there are no Western friends, odd and interesting Eastern players don't have the ethical qualms to be the new partners.

  Some would claim that Iraq was very much like that, stubbornly being in a situation that made inevitable an invasion on itself, but who knows. Suppose if the regime there fell in the fashion of an "Arab Spring", the corruption of the Oil for Food programme would eventually have been unveiled anyway. Look at all the uncovered wheeling and dealing done with Ghaddafi, Sons, & Co. prior to his regime's fall.

  Given the impetus for the Arab Spring, then maybe there's still good reason to have awkward friendships?
• Humane treatment and no deportations of illegal immigrants, the latter provided there is no criminal record (Gingrich and Santorum) — What to do with those who are still crossing over now?
  
  Then someone (Romney?) proposed fixing the legal immigration system — What really are the Republicans' good ideas as to how?
  
  

  Both legal and illegal immigrants that do get over, find work and live normal lives are some of the best people already. Here's why:
  
  • The legal immigrants, because they have the necessary skills and language abilities, and because they have persevered throughout the bureaucracy of the legal immigration system;
  
  • The illegal immigrants from Latin America, because they have persevered through a very taxing endeavour from whichever South American country over to the U.S.

  Do keep in mind that some of the immigrants don't survive the journey.

  Same with African immigrants to Europe. At least Al-Jazeera now has a whole programme devoted to warning about the pitfalls of life in the West.

The fate of Phlox

Disclaimer: All characters and their names property of CBS Paramount, but here I'd like to offer what else I had in mind for Phlox, because someone objected to my ideas of having Phlox killed off. Everything is fictitious and non-canon.

This was in reply to this post in an IMDb thread.

Oh yes, Trip I would have kept for certain, and Mayweather and a couple for Maco-s, too :> — to at first exercise the art of neuropressue ^_^
And I know Archer didn't look all that bad either... compared to an average American his age.

Then an IMDb user's objection to my wishes about killing Phlox off...

Okay, then Phlox should have lost some of his syrupy positiveness, become gradually and irreparably crazy because of the Delphic Expanse (T'Pol was spared) and then placed in a psychiatric institution as a response...

In the absence of such an institution casually floating in space just in Enterprise's merry way, he'd despondently stay stuck in the brig, rarely smile, and crazy-tell interesting medical things in the fashion of Pythia (the Oracle of Delphi) for Silik to desipher (because Silik alone perhaps doesn't know everything about medicine, but has to improvise and maybe work together with T'Pol).

Silik's attempts in interpreting Phlox would at the beginning be like subtly goading Phlox into a worse state, perhaps until Silik realizes that this conduct of his really was not a good thing, but then it's far too late and the exchange would devolve into something resembling an Andorian inquisition (see Shran interrogating Soval). I am sure Silik would otherwise enjoy Phlox's condition, if not for the nasty exercise of trying to extract knowledge impossibly trapped somehere in Phox's degenerate brain. I wouldn't want in Archer's place to risk T'Pol doing a mind-meld.

The smiles of a Phlox like this would be reserved for something really devious in order to thwart Silik (despite his somehow good intentions towards Enterprise crew) and lead Silik astray, much to the chagrin of Silik and eventually the people at ENT, who would then be forced to make the 'hard' decision of completely ignoring Phlox and finally returning him to his three wives on Denobula to work something out of the impossible condition he has so inevitably succumbed to; Well, as much as each of them wives cares enough to please. — After all, each of Phlox's wives has up to three other husbands anyway, and each husband of those vies for their attention, too.

For Phlox to have endless terror instead of a terrible end is something I'd much enjoy watching. Of course, John Billingsley would have a field day with a scenario like that, but then there'd have to be equally great material for John Fleck, too.

Giustino's best

Comment to Giustino's writeup "the missionary position" and comments to it, just in case it again fails to appear after I've deleted my original comment.

@Giustino:

I guess The ERR interview, where you describe Estonians to other people who might not know much about us, was odd, yet only so much fits into one article (or a blurb).

Your current writeup is very good and I then realized that your attitude was very Estonian (someone has concurred, also).

Indeed, there are some things in Estonia that can be changed and then some in this country that can't be changed (overnight).

The petty things might change over time; the more pressing stuff may require citizen action. (See the Raha lastele campaign, wherein parents are protesting against the Centrist-ruled Tallinn earmarking more money to its own propaganda-tv thing than the kindergartens, and then also ignoring numerous roads needy of repair and other high-priority stuff.)

I do agree with some of what Piimapukk wrote regarding age, where the oft-youthful need to change the world is replaced with things closer to the heart.

• The Tallinn-Tartu highway tames itself, with speed cameras and reconstructions (there will be less of those around Estonia this year because of cuts).
• "Missionary position" = "The White Man's Burden"... (?)
I remember a very uptight personality who was Swedish and who in late 2007 instead of concentrating on work thought himself to be so much holier-than-thou that he could imply in his lectures to a nice group of fifteen local people about how the way of life here in Estonia was wrong. With this and many other antics I believe he lost all trust of the class.

Fixed a glaring mistake in the original comment, with minor other rewordings and updates.

Türi

This comment is in reference to what Piimapukk wrote and in reaction to what viimenliivlane wrote in comment to Giustino's blog post "the vanity of giustino." The reason this comment was posted here was that my comment was deleted — when I reloaded the page sometime after having posted, this one was lost.

@viimneliivlane:

I first thought on 19.02.2011., 17:39 that
"
Türil is still literally and grammatically correct :P
"
— but then started having doubts:

The inessive (seesütlev) -s suffix means being inside of something, like Tallinnas (olen linnas/Räpinas/Elvas; illative/sisseütlev with läksin Tallinnasse, läksin linna), but some placenames that encompass a piece of land (like Türi or Mustamäe) require being on them grammatically: Türil, Mustamäel.

So, when going somewhere, declining placenames refers to going into them or onto them (Tallinnasse, Otepääle, respectively).

Yet when moving oneself ontop of something, then läksin mäe peale ([I] went on a hill), kõndisin/ronisin mäe otsa ([I] walked/climbed ontop of a hill), ronisin puu otsa ([I] climbed onto a tree). Speaking of trees and other vertical constructs (as far as I have understood): Notwithstanding whether one is on a tree or ontop of a tree, the person is still puu otsas. Anything (or anyone) that's physically attached to a tree, including branches, on puu küljes. Puu peal applies once the tree or a large piece of wood (horizontally) lies on the ground. On a tree and on its branch: puu otsas oksa peal.

In case of Türil, then the grammar cancels the raunchiness out, by design, methinks, because if I do take into account the dirty form, then it's in plural partitive (osastava mitmuses) already and that can't be further declined or construed in any other way than what it politely means. So there.

Naljakas valimisreklaam

Hiljuti potsatas mulle vahelduseks sisse midagi, mis mulle ehk alguses vaid naeratuse suule tõi, aga siis hiljem laginal naerma ajas.

Väljavõte Urmas Reinsalu valimisreklaamis veerust, kus on tema "algatused, mis on teoksil:"

“Kodutoetus paljulapselistele peredele

2008. aastal rakendatud kodutoetus ehk riiklik programm paljulapseliste perede elamistingimuste parandamiseks aitab igal aastal sadu peresid. Selle kaudu on juba uue kodu saanud või remonti teinud pered, kus kasvab üle 4000 lapse.

”

Muahahahahah :D

Idee ise on sisuliselt muidugi väga armas, ainult et mitte ükski pere ei ole puht bioloogiliselt võimeline endale nii palju lapsi sigitama. Nii palju ei lastaks ka adopteerida.

Võib-olla peeti silmas sipelgaid ja mesilasi?